Archive for the 'Culture' Category

Movie Reviews

I use a couple of movie review sites to get a flavour for a particular film, and I'm starting to think they are actually quite pointless.

Most of them allow you to rate a film out of 5 or 10 stars – or even using a percentage.  Very useful you might think, until you realise that the sheer volume of people using them (1000s) mean that they are pretty much useless.

For example, I just looked through 100 film recommendations on Love Film.com, and almost every single one of them had three stars.  On other sites, I've noticed that movies tend towards exactly that – around 60%.  Why?  You can't give no stars in a rating, so the median rating will always be 3 – and over such a huge number of people, the mean will tend towards that number too.

The best site I've found is Rotten Tomatoes, which collates critics, who are usually a bit more discerning.  The scores there do differ much more.  But even there, you still get wildly different reviews.

All of which tells me, you can't tell how good a film is going to be unless you've seen it.  How profound.

Nick Griffin and Haiti

I was rather appalled to find some comments by Nick Griffin about Haiti on the BBC website.  They're from a couple of weeks ago, and apparently he published them on his Twitter site.

Mr Griffin's original postings, on Facebook and Twitter, said: "While the Haiti earthquake is terrible, the winter death toll in Britain will be similar. No aid here though."

About 45,000-50,000 people have died since Tuesday's 7.0 magnitude earthquake hit Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince and 300,000 have been made homeless, according to UN estimates.

The Pan American Health Organization has estimated that the death toll could be as high as 100,000.

Now, it is estimated that there will be something like 45,000 extra deaths this winter, which is high, but nowhere near 100,000 (and I have heard reports on the news that it could be up to 150,000).

In response to criticism, Griffin and his deputy Simon Darby refused to back down.  Griffin wrote,

"Individuals should give whatever they feel appropriate, but Britain is bankrupt. Fifty thousands pensioners will die... of cold this winter.

"Boys get blown to bits because we can't afford to armour their Land Rovers.... Sending aid to rioting ingrates while our own people die is stinking elite hypocrisy."

I suppose it shouldn't have surprised me that Griffin should make such comments, given the kinds of things he has said before.  But it did – there is a total lack of compassion for anyone outside his little box, no concept of humanity as a whole.

When asked about Griffin's comments, Darby said,

"I'd rather see that £6m that we spent keeping our own people alive. You look after your own first.

"If they've got surplus money to give away to Haiti – how many people have died because we didn't have the infrastructure to grit the roads?"

Now, I can see where statements like this come from – 'charity begins at home' and all that – after all, it wouldn't be right for children to starve just so their parents could give generously to Comic Relief.  But that is an example in extremis.  If you wait until you are sorted yourself, if you give away only your 'surplus', how much help would we wealthy westerners be to the developing world, whose poverty is often a direct result of our own exploitation of their natural resources?

Any sensible person knows that you are never 'sorted'.  There are always extra expenses, more things we 'need'.  Our country's infrastructure cannot be sorted for £6m, but many lives can be saved in Haiti.  We share a common humanity with these so-called 'rioting ingrates', and the responsibility of those who have to help those who don't would, I suspect, look very different to Griffin and Darby were Haiti the rich developed nation, and Britain the poor country hit by a devastating earthquake.

Charity does not begin at home, and we should not look after our own when we should be helping others.  Yes, we need to be sensible and help elderly people pay their fuel bills, maintain our country's road network, etc etc, but we also have a responsibility to help those in dire need, all over the world, simply because they are people too, and no less deserving to live than we are.

The right to live belongs to all humans everywhere – even Nick Griffin and Simon Darby.

BBC iPlayer Desktop and Snow Leopard

Since I upgraded to Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) I have been unable to download programmes using the BBC iPlayer Desktop.  It worked fine before, but the upgrade killed it.

I tried uninstalling it, removing it using AppCleaner, uninstalling Adobe AIR, restarting etc etc, and eventually just gave up.

Today however I solved the problem!

I uninstalled iPlayer Desktop using AppCleaner, and then deleted the directory:

~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/AIR

Where ~/ is your home directory.

I then went back to the iPlayer website, reinstalled iPlayer Desktop, and now all works fine!

I hope this helps someone else.

Amazing Art

Now often I find art stupid, rubbish, pretentious, etc etc – I'm sure it's because I don't understand it.

This this is stupendously good – I genuinely couldn't believe my eyes the first time I saw it..

‘Africa Needs God’

I nearly fell off my chair when I read this article by Matthew Parris.  This is how he ends his article:

To the rural African mind, this is an explanation of why one would not climb the mountain. It's... well, there. Just there. Why interfere? Nothing to be done about it, or with it. Hillary's further explanation – that nobody else had climbed it – would stand as a second reason for passivity.

Christianity, post-Reformation and post-Luther, with its teaching of a direct, personal, two-way link between the individual and God, unmediated by the collective, and unsubordinate to any other human being, smashes straight through the philosphical/spiritual framework I've just described. It offers something to hold on to to those anxious to cast off a crushing tribal groupthink. That is why and how it liberates.

Those who want Africa to walk tall amid 21st-century global competition must not kid themselves that providing the material means or even the knowhow that accompanies what we call development will make the change. A whole belief system must first be supplanted.

And I'm afraid it has to be supplanted by another. Removing Christian evangelism from the African equation may leave the continent at the mercy of a malign fusion of Nike, the witch doctor, the mobile phone and the machete.

Living in the North

So according to this report two weeks ago, all the people who live in the North should move to the South, because regeneration efforts are failing.  To avoid become 'trapped' in poverty, people should move to Oxford, or Cambridge, say.

Of course, all the major parties rubbished it, and the councils of various Northern cities did as well.  David Cameron said it was 'insane'.

Imagine my delight when I read another story today, this time about 'mapping' Britain's 'happiest places'.  It seems Edinburgh comes out bottom – but, in a delicious irony given the story a couple of weeks ago – EIGHT of the top TEN happiest places in Britain are in the North of England or Scotland.

Now, what does that tell you?  It tells me that stupid middle-class think-tanks assume that all that matters is financial well-being.

So, my call to the South is: come up here, it's a much happier place to live!

Secret ballot?

I voted with my wife in the local elections on Thursday.  Imagine my shock when I realised that the so-called 'secret' ballot is the exact opposite.  While my ballot paper doesn't have my name written on, it may as well do.

I walked in, and gave my voter number, which was written down on a piece of paper, next to my ballot number.  I was given the corresponding ballot paper, and voted.  How in the world is that 'secret'?!  I can understand they want to keep a record of who's voted, but to record our individual voter number next to our ballot number means someone could identify exactly who everyone voted for.

I almost spoilt my ballot paper in protest – perhaps I will in future elections when faced with a choice of near-identical candidates who I know next to nothing about.

Surely democracy should be more exciting than this?  Is it just me?  I feel like we need to reform our political system completely, away from the party system.  The parties used to have major ideological differences.  Thanks to New Labour, and the move to the centre-right of all the major parties, they are all pretty much the same, except for the people in charge.

Perhaps we should go for a system where we vote for positions in government as well as local MPs.  I don't know, but there must be a better way.  And while we're at it, let's make the ballot really secret, and not just pretend it is.