Archive for the 'Culture' Category

Lawyer of the Rings?

My favourite movie trilogy of all time has been involved in lawsuits pretty much since it was finished - or rather, the company that made it (New Line) has been.

The twists and turns are followed by this article.  It is sad that people have had to resort to litigation, over what appears to be 'unabashed and insatiable greed' on the part of the studio.

The latest lawsuit has been filed by the Tolkien family, but not simply for their own gain:

The Tolkien suit may prove to be especially troublesome for New Line,
if only because it has the earmarks of a public relations nightmare.
The plaintiffs include a charitable trust that is overseen by family
members of the author, who died in 1973, and includes among its
beneficiaries worthy organizations like the Darfur Appeal and the World
Cancer Research Foundation.

It seems that the studio may have been involved in some 'accounting chicanery' that has been 'cheating' others' out of their fair share of the gross profit from the movies.

The saga continues...

Change

Along with many others (I suspect) I have been following with interest the race for the Democratic presidential candidate in America.  It seems that Obama is building momentum - although Clinton is only a few delegates behind him, and wins in Texas and Ohio would put her back in front.  Rarely is democracy actually exciting!

Obama's main policy seems to be 'change'.  'Under me things won't be like they've been before.'  As a political weapon it is potent indeed: he's running against the wife of a former president, and looks like he will battle it out with McCain, who has run before.

We have seen a similar thing in this country with David Cameron and the Conservatives.  They have long been claiming to be 'fresh' and 'new', that they will change things.  But when the dust settles from the excitement they generate, the question is begged: what are they going to change, and to what are they going to change it?!

To be fair, the Conservatives in this country have been suggesting some policies recently.  Obama would do well to learn their lesson; Labour spent two years hammering Cameron and his Conservatives, even casting him as a chameleon, because his message of change had little substance.

If he hasn't already, I hope that Obama is coming up with some concrete policy changes, which he will be able to go into detail on if (possibly when) he wins the Democratic nomination and goes head-to-head with McCain.

Northern = Stupid?

This made me laugh a few days ago:

'Brain Training' slammed by 'Watchdog'

Apparently the computer game (which claims to train your brain) can't recognise northern accents.  So if you shout 'yeller' instead of 'yellow' at the console, it tells you that you're stupid.

What a match

Ireland deserved to win.  You won't often hear me say that.

The French were brilliant in the first half, but faded away in the second.  I thought O'Gara and O'Driscoll played so well in the second half, after a few mistakes in the first, and deserved at least to get a try at the end to draw the match.

After that, I think France will get the Grand Slam - Wales were ok today, but Scotland are a poor side at the moment, and Wales made a catalogue of errors that a better side would have punished them for.

I'm looking forward to seeing England play tomorrow - I hope we can be a bit more expansive, like the games that were played today.

Sharia Law

For the last two days I have been rather astonished that the main headline on the BBC News website has been about Rowan Williams' comments on Sharia law.  The headlines come from a lecture he gave, and an interview for Radio 4.  Yesterday morning this page was added to his website, giving links to the full transcripts of his interview and lecture.

I have to say that I really feel for the Archbishop.  He is an extremely intelligent and thoughtful man.  Unlike many people (including me, I think), he doesn't say rash things as they pop into his head, but after a great deal of reflection.  To claim that he should resign, that he is unfit for his job, is such an over-reaction, and yet, sadly, it is not unusual in the media.  As a friend points out, the same thing happened to the Pope last year.

Here is an explanation of what the Archbishop was actually trying to say, from his website:

In his lecture, the Archbishop sought carefully to explore the limits
of a unitary and secular legal system in the presence of an
increasingly plural (including religiously plural) society and to see
how such a unitary system might be able to accommodate religious
claims. Behind this is the underlying principle that Christians cannot
claim exceptions from a secular unitary system on religious grounds
(for instance in situations where Christian doctors might not be
compelled to perform abortions), if they are not willing to consider
how a unitary system can accommodate other religious consciences. In
doing so the Archbishop was not suggesting the introduction of parallel
legal jurisdictions, but exploring ways in which reasonable
accommodation might be made within existing arrangements for religious
conscience.

What did the Archbishop actually say?

It seems that many within the media are too hungry for headlines to be bothered to find out what someone has actually said.  And it is not only the media, but politicians as well:

This isn't a path down which we should go... the British legal system should apply to everybody equally.

"You cannot run two systems of law alongside each other.

"That would, in my view, be a recipe for chaos, social chaos." 

Andy Burnham, Culture Secretary

From my understanding of what Dr Williams said, he would wholeheartedly agree with Andy Burnham (and all the others who have been saying similar things, for example Nick Clegg).  The Archbishop suggested that we should look at recognising some aspects of Sharia within our legal system, as indeed we already recognise some issues of conscience for other faiths (as in the passage from the Archbishop's website I quoted above).

One of the most generous and kindest responses to his thoughts came not from members of the Church of England, but from the Muslim Council of Britain:

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said it was grateful
for the Archbishop's "thoughtful intervention" on the discussion of the
place of Islam and Muslims in modern Britain.

A spokesman said: "The MCB observes, with some sadness,
the hysterical misrepresentations of his speech which serves only to
drive a wedge between British people."

Archbishop defends Sharia remarks

I do wonder how long Dr Williams will remain Archbishop.  He has had a torrid time, from the accusations of being a druid, to misrepresentation in the media, to ridicule because of his facial hair, to the brink of a break-up in the Anglican Communion.  His is not a job I would wish on anyone right now.

100 Beckhams

The new England coach, Fabio Capello, left David Beckham out of the England squad for today's friendly against Switzerland, apparently because he is not 'match fit'.

Beckham himself has admitted that this is true - however he has been training with Arsenal for a month, and he is on 99 caps.  It was a great opportunity for Capello to give Beckham the honour of leading his team out as captain to earn his 100th cap - it's a friendly, and he could have taken him off after half an hour.. and who knows, he might have pulled something out of the bag.

I suspect this is Capello asserting his authority over the England team over against everyone else - especially the media, but also the players.  It is his team, and his job to do however he likes.

Let's hope the team do well today, or he'll have trouble in the press..

Atheist carol-singing

I was preparing to blog on an article I read in The Times the other day, and this morning discovered a friend had done just that! His blog post is here, the original article is here and some letters sent to the editor in response are here.

Apparently Richard Dawkins, outspoken and well-known atheist, enjoys singing carols at Christmas. Libby Purves writes:

How can his famous, well-modulated voice choke out the word 'adore', apropos a God he calls a 'misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully'?

diagacht argues that one can appreciate the 'culturally significant pieces of music' without making any statement of belief by singing them. I'm not sure that is the case. I think there is a difference between observing (e.g. appreciating some Bach at a music concert) and participating (e.g. singing Christian carols at Christmas).

Given the strength of Dawkins' antipathy towards God and religion in general (particularly the bit Libby Purves quotes above), I do find it amusing that he enjoys singing carols so much.