Archive for the 'Culture' Category

Page 2 of 4

Materialism

On the BBC website today I read this article:
Children 'damaged' by materialism.  It is particularly aimed at advertisers who specifically target children.

The Children's Society said adults had to "take responsibility for the current level of marketing to children".

Bob Reitemeier, chief executive of the society, said: "A crucial question raised by the inquiry is whether childhood should be a space where developing minds are free from concentrated sales techniques.

"To accuse children of being materialistic in such a culture is a cop-out," he said.

Reitemeier said: "Unless we question our own behaviour as a society we risk creating a generation who are left unfulfilled through chasing unattainable lifestyles."

And Rowan Williams said:

Children should be encouraged to value themselves for who they are as people rather than what they own.

The selling of lifestyles to children creates a culture
of material competitiveness and promotes acquisitive individualism at
the expense of the principles of community and co-operation.

There is even a suggestion that 'commercial pressures' may cause psychological problems in later life.

The report is rather terrifying, but not perhaps surprising.  The relentless drive to have more and own more pervades our entire culture.  Our economic system of capitalism relies on human desire as its driving force.  More and more companies are becoming skilled in manipulating that desire through slick advertising, so that we desire things we don't need. 

Somehow, as Rowan Williams said, we have come to value ourselves more in terms of our prosperity, our possessions, than in our value as people.

This story hit a nerve with me this morning because I have just read Luke 12, in which Jesus says this:

Take care, and be on your guard against all covetousness, for one's life does not consist in the abundance of one's possessions.
Luke 12.15 (ESV)

Jesus then goes on to tell the parable of the man who stored up crops for himself saying, 'relax, eat, drink, be merry.'  But God took it all away from him that night, and he had nothing.  Rather, Jesus says, seek the kingdom of God, and store up treasure in heaven, where it cannot be stolen or destroyed.

For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
Luke 12.34 (ESV)

Lawyer of the Rings?

My favourite movie trilogy of all time has been involved in lawsuits pretty much since it was finished – or rather, the company that made it (New Line) has been.

The twists and turns are followed by this article.  It is sad that people have had to resort to litigation, over what appears to be 'unabashed and insatiable greed' on the part of the studio.

The latest lawsuit has been filed by the Tolkien family, but not simply for their own gain:

The Tolkien suit may prove to be especially troublesome for New Line,
if only because it has the earmarks of a public relations nightmare.
The plaintiffs include a charitable trust that is overseen by family
members of the author, who died in 1973, and includes among its
beneficiaries worthy organizations like the Darfur Appeal and the World
Cancer Research Foundation.

It seems that the studio may have been involved in some 'accounting chicanery' that has been 'cheating' others' out of their fair share of the gross profit from the movies.

The saga continues...

Change

Along with many others (I suspect) I have been following with interest the race for the Democratic presidential candidate in America.  It seems that Obama is building momentum – although Clinton is only a few delegates behind him, and wins in Texas and Ohio would put her back in front.  Rarely is democracy actually exciting!

Obama's main policy seems to be 'change'.  'Under me things won't be like they've been before.'  As a political weapon it is potent indeed: he's running against the wife of a former president, and looks like he will battle it out with McCain, who has run before.

We have seen a similar thing in this country with David Cameron and the Conservatives.  They have long been claiming to be 'fresh' and 'new', that they will change things.  But when the dust settles from the excitement they generate, the question is begged: what are they going to change, and to what are they going to change it?!

To be fair, the Conservatives in this country have been suggesting some policies recently.  Obama would do well to learn their lesson; Labour spent two years hammering Cameron and his Conservatives, even casting him as a chameleon, because his message of change had little substance.

If he hasn't already, I hope that Obama is coming up with some concrete policy changes, which he will be able to go into detail on if (possibly when) he wins the Democratic nomination and goes head-to-head with McCain.

Northern = Stupid?

This made me laugh a few days ago:

'Brain Training' slammed by 'Watchdog'

Apparently the computer game (which claims to train your brain) can't recognise northern accents.  So if you shout 'yeller' instead of 'yellow' at the console, it tells you that you're stupid.

What a match

Ireland deserved to win.  You won't often hear me say that.

The French were brilliant in the first half, but faded away in the second.  I thought O'Gara and O'Driscoll played so well in the second half, after a few mistakes in the first, and deserved at least to get a try at the end to draw the match.

After that, I think France will get the Grand Slam – Wales were ok today, but Scotland are a poor side at the moment, and Wales made a catalogue of errors that a better side would have punished them for.

I'm looking forward to seeing England play tomorrow – I hope we can be a bit more expansive, like the games that were played today.

Sharia Law

For the last two days I have been rather astonished that the main headline on the BBC News website has been about Rowan Williams' comments on Sharia law.  The headlines come from a lecture he gave, and an interview for Radio 4.  Yesterday morning this page was added to his website, giving links to the full transcripts of his interview and lecture.

I have to say that I really feel for the Archbishop.  He is an extremely intelligent and thoughtful man.  Unlike many people (including me, I think), he doesn't say rash things as they pop into his head, but after a great deal of reflection.  To claim that he should resign, that he is unfit for his job, is such an over-reaction, and yet, sadly, it is not unusual in the media.  As a friend points out, the same thing happened to the Pope last year.

Here is an explanation of what the Archbishop was actually trying to say, from his website:

In his lecture, the Archbishop sought carefully to explore the limits
of a unitary and secular legal system in the presence of an
increasingly plural (including religiously plural) society and to see
how such a unitary system might be able to accommodate religious
claims. Behind this is the underlying principle that Christians cannot
claim exceptions from a secular unitary system on religious grounds
(for instance in situations where Christian doctors might not be
compelled to perform abortions), if they are not willing to consider
how a unitary system can accommodate other religious consciences. In
doing so the Archbishop was not suggesting the introduction of parallel
legal jurisdictions, but exploring ways in which reasonable
accommodation might be made within existing arrangements for religious
conscience.

What did the Archbishop actually say?

It seems that many within the media are too hungry for headlines to be bothered to find out what someone has actually said.  And it is not only the media, but politicians as well:

This isn't a path down which we should go... the British legal system should apply to everybody equally.

"You cannot run two systems of law alongside each other.

"That would, in my view, be a recipe for chaos, social chaos."

Andy Burnham, Culture Secretary

From my understanding of what Dr Williams said, he would wholeheartedly agree with Andy Burnham (and all the others who have been saying similar things, for example Nick Clegg).  The Archbishop suggested that we should look at recognising some aspects of Sharia within our legal system, as indeed we already recognise some issues of conscience for other faiths (as in the passage from the Archbishop's website I quoted above).

One of the most generous and kindest responses to his thoughts came not from members of the Church of England, but from the Muslim Council of Britain:

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said it was grateful
for the Archbishop's "thoughtful intervention" on the discussion of the
place of Islam and Muslims in modern Britain.

A spokesman said: "The MCB observes, with some sadness,
the hysterical misrepresentations of his speech which serves only to
drive a wedge between British people."

Archbishop defends Sharia remarks

I do wonder how long Dr Williams will remain Archbishop.  He has had a torrid time, from the accusations of being a druid, to misrepresentation in the media, to ridicule because of his facial hair, to the brink of a break-up in the Anglican Communion.  His is not a job I would wish on anyone right now.

100 Beckhams

The new England coach, Fabio Capello, left David Beckham out of the England squad for today's friendly against Switzerland, apparently because he is not 'match fit'.

Beckham himself has admitted that this is true – however he has been training with Arsenal for a month, and he is on 99 caps.  It was a great opportunity for Capello to give Beckham the honour of leading his team out as captain to earn his 100th cap – it's a friendly, and he could have taken him off after half an hour.. and who knows, he might have pulled something out of the bag.

I suspect this is Capello asserting his authority over the England team over against everyone else – especially the media, but also the players.  It is his team, and his job to do however he likes.

Let's hope the team do well today, or he'll have trouble in the press..

Categories

Twitter

Recent Comments

Archives