Service for Burglars?!

Compare these two press reports very carefully.  The first report is the original, from the Telegraph, the second was reported subsequently by V3.

The company interviewed 1,317 people – 57 per cent of which described the street mapping service an ‘intrusion' while 24 per cent said that they believed it was simply ‘a service for burglars’.

Seventy-three per cent of the people polled who called the service an ‘intrusion’ said that they were most angered by the fact they have not given permission for the publishing of images.

Just over a third of those interviewed believe that the expansion of the service, which rolled out yesterday, was a positive move.

Street View Concerns

According to the report 57 per cent of those interviewed described the service an ‘intrusion' while 24 per cent said that they believed it was ‘a service for burglars’. A staggering seventy-three per cent labeled the service an ‘intrusion’ and said that they were most angered by the fact they have not given permission for the publishing of images.

Just over a third said they thought the expansion of the service, announced on Thursday, was a positive thing.

Street View Slammed

Is it me or is that really bad journalism by V3?!

Gordon Brown. Tough Guy.

I wish these posters weren't hoaxes.. it would certainly make the election more interesting.

I never thought I'd enjoy something done by The Grauniad..!

Movie Reviews

I use a couple of movie review sites to get a flavour for a particular film, and I'm starting to think they are actually quite pointless.

Most of them allow you to rate a film out of 5 or 10 stars – or even using a percentage.  Very useful you might think, until you realise that the sheer volume of people using them (1000s) mean that they are pretty much useless.

For example, I just looked through 100 film recommendations on Love Film.com, and almost every single one of them had three stars.  On other sites, I've noticed that movies tend towards exactly that – around 60%.  Why?  You can't give no stars in a rating, so the median rating will always be 3 – and over such a huge number of people, the mean will tend towards that number too.

The best site I've found is Rotten Tomatoes, which collates critics, who are usually a bit more discerning.  The scores there do differ much more.  But even there, you still get wildly different reviews.

All of which tells me, you can't tell how good a film is going to be unless you've seen it.  How profound.

The Message for the Broken

Jesus' teaching consistently attracted the irreligious while offending the Bible-believing, religious people of his day. However, in the main, our churches today do not have this effect. The kind of outsider Jesus attracted are not attracted to contemporary churches, even our most avant-garde ones. We tend to draw conservative, buttoned-down, moralistic people. The licentious and liberated or the broken and marginal avoid church. That can mean only one thing. If the preaching of our ministers and the practice of our parishioners do not have the same effect on people that Jesus had, then we must not be declaring the same message that Jesus did. If our churches aren't appealing to younger brothers, they must be more full of elder brothers than we'd like to think.

Tim Keller, The Prodigal God, p.16

Thanks to Custard for the great quotation.  I suppose this question has haunted me for quite a long time.  We are quite convinced that our preaching is faithful, that we are saying the right things, encouraging the right things, but the churches I have known have almost universally been precisely not irreligious.

Is it that we don't know how to encourage the right kind of practice?  Or is it more that there is a tendency to want to think the 'correct' things, rather than go out of our way to do the hard, un-selfish, loving and caring things?

I love things to be in order, to be just so, but that is precisely not how Jesus operated, and it can so easily lead to the kind of situation Tim Keller describes.  I find Keller's words hugely challenging.  They seem to me to be to be vital for the church's mission, yet at the same time almost impossible to put into practice.

Because, to me, I want a church for the broken, not a church for the religious.  I feel like a broken man, not a religious man, and somehow that means I don't feel like I belong in the church – the very place I should belong, in the arms of God.

Outlook 2010 Previewer Windows 7

I've been having problems with previewing PDFs within Outlook since I installed Windows 7 (64-bit). I tried installing Outlook 2010 but it still didn't work.  However, this did:

http://bink.nu/news/fix-adobe-pdf-preview-handler-on-64-bit-windows.aspx

Computer Games

Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music.

Marcus Brigstocke

Nick Griffin and Haiti

I was rather appalled to find some comments by Nick Griffin about Haiti on the BBC website.  They're from a couple of weeks ago, and apparently he published them on his Twitter site.

Mr Griffin's original postings, on Facebook and Twitter, said: "While the Haiti earthquake is terrible, the winter death toll in Britain will be similar. No aid here though."

About 45,000-50,000 people have died since Tuesday's 7.0 magnitude earthquake hit Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince and 300,000 have been made homeless, according to UN estimates.

The Pan American Health Organization has estimated that the death toll could be as high as 100,000.

Now, it is estimated that there will be something like 45,000 extra deaths this winter, which is high, but nowhere near 100,000 (and I have heard reports on the news that it could be up to 150,000).

In response to criticism, Griffin and his deputy Simon Darby refused to back down.  Griffin wrote,

"Individuals should give whatever they feel appropriate, but Britain is bankrupt. Fifty thousands pensioners will die... of cold this winter.

"Boys get blown to bits because we can't afford to armour their Land Rovers.... Sending aid to rioting ingrates while our own people die is stinking elite hypocrisy."

I suppose it shouldn't have surprised me that Griffin should make such comments, given the kinds of things he has said before.  But it did – there is a total lack of compassion for anyone outside his little box, no concept of humanity as a whole.

When asked about Griffin's comments, Darby said,

"I'd rather see that £6m that we spent keeping our own people alive. You look after your own first.

"If they've got surplus money to give away to Haiti – how many people have died because we didn't have the infrastructure to grit the roads?"

Now, I can see where statements like this come from – 'charity begins at home' and all that – after all, it wouldn't be right for children to starve just so their parents could give generously to Comic Relief.  But that is an example in extremis.  If you wait until you are sorted yourself, if you give away only your 'surplus', how much help would we wealthy westerners be to the developing world, whose poverty is often a direct result of our own exploitation of their natural resources?

Any sensible person knows that you are never 'sorted'.  There are always extra expenses, more things we 'need'.  Our country's infrastructure cannot be sorted for £6m, but many lives can be saved in Haiti.  We share a common humanity with these so-called 'rioting ingrates', and the responsibility of those who have to help those who don't would, I suspect, look very different to Griffin and Darby were Haiti the rich developed nation, and Britain the poor country hit by a devastating earthquake.

Charity does not begin at home, and we should not look after our own when we should be helping others.  Yes, we need to be sensible and help elderly people pay their fuel bills, maintain our country's road network, etc etc, but we also have a responsibility to help those in dire need, all over the world, simply because they are people too, and no less deserving to live than we are.

The right to live belongs to all humans everywhere – even Nick Griffin and Simon Darby.

Categories

Twitter

Recent Comments

Archives